Hearings · What to expect

Fitness to Practise Hearings: What Healthcare Professionals Should Expect

Who sits on the panel and who else is in the room, how MPTS, NMC and HCPTS hearings differ, what happens before the hearing, the three stages and your role in each, giving evidence, public and private sessions, and what happens if you do not attend.

Reviewed October 2026 against MPTS, NMC, HCPTS, GDC and GPhC guidance and data

Who is in the room Three regulators compared Giving evidence

Short answer: a fitness to practise hearing is a formal but not criminal process. A panel of three, including at least one member of your profession and one lay member, hears the case, advised on the law by a legally qualified chair or an independent legal assessor. The regulator must prove the facts on the balance of probabilities. The panel then decides whether your fitness to practise is currently impaired and, if so, what sanction is needed. You can attend, be represented, call witnesses, question the regulator's witnesses and give evidence yourself. Hearings are usually public, with health matters heard in private, and they can go ahead without you if you do not attend.

Key takeaways

  • Preparation decides much of the hearing. Directions, bundles and deadlines start weeks before day one.
  • Your written statement usually stands as your main evidence. Expect to be questioned on it.
  • Impairment is judged at the date of the hearing, so up-to-date evidence of insight and remediation matters.
  • Not attending, or not keeping your contact details up to date, can mean the case is decided without you.
  • Support is available, from representation to peer supporters who can sit with you.

Most concerns never reach a hearing. If yours has, our guides to investigations and possible outcomes explain how you got here and what can follow. This guide is about the hearing itself.

Hearings by the numbers

Official figures from five regulators show what hearings actually look like: how many there are, how they are held, how often professionals attend, and how often cases end without a sanction.

MPTS doctors, 2023

  • 250doctors' cases concluded at new tribunal hearings
  • 56%of new hearings held virtually, 40% in person and 4% hybrid
  • 26%of doctors across all hearing types did not attend or send a legal representative
  • 3,063hearing days across all tribunal types

MPTS Report to Parliament 2023

NMC 2024 to 2025

  • 647final decisions made at meetings and hearings
  • 15%ended with fitness to practise found not impaired (94 cases)
  • 4%ended with the facts not proved (27 cases)
  • 691interim orders imposed in the year

NMC Annual Fitness to Practise Report 2024 to 2025

HCPTS 2024 to 2025

  • 189cases concluded at final hearing, plus 22 by consent
  • 24%final hearing adjournment rate
  • 17%went part heard, needing extra days; 7% adjourned before any evidence
  • 100review hearings concluded

HCPTS report to HCPC Council, May 2025

GDC dental, 2024

  • 73initial practice committee hearings
  • 32%of 74 substantive decisions found not impaired; 24% erased, 26% suspended
  • 10.2months median from case examiner referral to the start of the hearing
  • 43%of hearings started within nine months of referral

GDC Fitness to Practise Statistical Report 2024

GPhC pharmacy, 2024 to 2025

  • 69fitness to practise committee hearings
  • 19registrants removed from the register, up from 13
  • 22suspensions, down from 26
  • ~3 yrsmedian time to close cases at the committee, with 25% more sitting days

GPhC Annual Report 2024 to 2025

Three points stand out. First, a hearing is not a foregone conclusion: at the NMC, around one in five final decisions in 2024 to 2025 ended with no sanction because the facts were not proved or fitness to practise was not impaired, and at the GDC almost a third of substantive decisions in 2024 found no impairment. Second, about a quarter of doctors in 2023 neither attended nor sent a legal representative, which means the panel heard nothing from them directly. Third, about one in four HCPTS final hearings did not finish as planned, so be ready for your case to run longer than listed.

A meeting or a hearing?

Not every case is decided at a hearing with people present. The NMC can decide cases at a meeting, where the panel considers only the documents and the professional does not attend, or at a hearing, where people can give live evidence and be questioned. Its guidance is clear: "We'll always hold a hearing to conclude a case if the nurse, midwife or nursing associate wants one." If you do not ask for a hearing or do not respond, the NMC will usually hold a meeting, unless the panel decides a hearing is desirable. Hearings can be held remotely or at a hearing centre, decided case by case.

Think carefully before choosing a meeting A meeting means the panel never hears from you directly. Where facts are disputed or your insight and remediation are central, the chance to explain in person can matter. Take advice on which suits your case.

Who is in the room

Whether the hearing is in person or online, the same roles are present.

The panel
ChairLeads the hearing. At the MPTS, may be legally qualified
Professional memberFrom your profession
Lay memberNot from a regulated profession
Legal assessorIndependent legal adviser where the chair is not legally qualified. Advises; does not decide
The regulator's caseA presenting officer or lawyer who presents the allegations
You and your representativeA lawyer, union or professional body representative, or a lay supporter
WitnessesCalled by either side, and questioned
Hearings staff and observersStaff manage the day; public and press may observe public sessions

How the three main tribunals compare

FeatureMPTS (doctors)NMCHCPTS (HCPC)
PanelThree: at least one doctor, at least one lay member, and a chair who may be legally qualifiedRegistered nurses or midwives and lay membersThree: a chair, a member of your profession and a lay member
Legal adviceFrom the legally qualified chair, or an independent legal assessorAn independent legal assessorAn independent legal assessor, who may help write the decision but does not decide
StructureFacts, then impairment, then sanctionFacts, then impairment, then sanctionUsually facts, grounds and impairment together, then sanction
Decided without attendance?Can proceed in your absenceMeeting on the papers is possible; a hearing if you want oneCan proceed in your absence
Public?Yes, health matters in privateUsually, health matters in privateYes, except in exceptional circumstances

Sources: MPTS resource for doctors on new MPT hearings; NMC guidance on meetings and hearings and on attending a hearing; HCPC substantive hearings fact sheet; HCPTS stages of a final hearing.

Before the hearing: the timetable that matters

A great deal is decided before the first day. Missing a deadline can limit what evidence the panel will consider.

  1. Listing

    The hearing is scheduled

    The MPTS's service target is to list a hearing within nine months of the GMC's referral.

  2. Case management

    Directions are set

    At the MPTS, listing calls and pre-hearing meetings with legally qualified case managers set deadlines for witness statements, expert reports, bundles and witness timetables. Failing to comply can lead to evidence being excluded, adverse inferences or costs.

  3. Bundles

    The documents are exchanged

    At the HCPTS, the hearing bundle is sent at least 42 days before the hearing, and documents you want the panel to have must be sent at least 28 days before.

  4. Admissions

    What is agreed is narrowed

    Facts, documents and witness statements can be agreed, so witnesses do not need to attend for points nobody disputes.

  5. Legal points

    Arguments are filed

    At the MPTS, preliminary legal arguments are set out in skeleton arguments of no more than five pages.

This is also the time to update your evidence of insight and remediation. Our guides to remediation evidence and demonstrating insight explain what to prepare.

The three stages, and your part in each

Stage 1

Facts

Did it happen?

The regulator must prove each allegation on the balance of probabilities. Witness statements usually stand as each witness's main evidence, and witnesses can be questioned by the other side and the panel. Your role: challenge evidence you dispute, give your own account, and call witnesses who can help.

Stage 2

Impairment

Is fitness to practise impaired today?

If facts are proved, the panel decides whether they amount to misconduct or another ground, and whether your fitness to practise is currently impaired. Your role: show insight, remediation and current safe practice, with up-to-date evidence.

Stage 3

Sanction

What is needed to protect the public?

If impairment is found, the panel applies its sanctions guidance, starting with the least restrictive option. Your role: help the panel see what is proportionate, with testimonials, mitigation and a realistic plan.

The panel usually retires in private to decide each stage, then announces its decision in the hearing, with a written copy. At the HCPTS, the panel usually considers facts, grounds and impairment together, unless the case is complex enough to separate them.

Giving evidence

At the MPTS, your written statement will normally stand as your evidence-in-chief, and you may then be questioned by the regulator's representative and the panel. At the HCPTS, you have the right to give oral evidence on oath or affirmation at the facts, grounds, impairment and sanction stages.

  • Know your own statement. You will be questioned on it. Inconsistency damages credibility on everything else.
  • Listen to the whole question. Answer what is asked, briefly. It is fine to ask for a question to be repeated.
  • It is acceptable not to remember. Say so rather than guess. A confident wrong answer is worse than an honest "I don't recall".
  • Speak to the panel. They are the decision-makers, not the person asking the question.
  • Ask for breaks and adjustments. Hearings have regular breaks, and reasonable adjustments can be requested in advance.
  • Show insight in your own words. Panels test whether your written reflection reflects real understanding. Our insight guide lists questions to prepare for.

A hearing-day checklist

In person
  • Your copy of the bundle, with your own notes
  • Your statement and reflection, read again the night before
  • Updated evidence agreed in advance with your representative
  • Water, any medication and something to eat
  • Arrive early to meet your representative
Online
  • Test the platform, camera and microphone beforehand
  • A quiet, private room where you will not be interrupted
  • A second device or phone number in case the connection drops
  • The bundle open, either printed or on a separate screen
  • Notifications switched off

Public, private and the press

Fitness to practise hearings are usually held in public, so that the public can see how professionals are regulated. The MPTS hears matters about a doctor's health in private, and other matters can be heard in private where the circumstances outweigh the public interest. The NMC says a panel can hear all or part of a hearing in private when it is reasonable and proportionate, and health cases are heard privately. For virtual NMC hearings, a limited number of observers are given audio-only access. The HCPC holds hearings in public in all but exceptional circumstances, and publicises them in advance.

If there is a reason for part of your case to be heard in private, such as your health or a third party's private information, raise it with your representative before the hearing.

If you cannot, or do not, attend

A hearing can go ahead in your absence. Regulators must take reasonable steps to tell you about it, but you are expected to keep your contact details up to date and engage with the process.

Real case · Court of Appeal · 2016

General Medical Council v Adeogba and Visvardis [2016] EWCA Civ 162

The facts. Two doctors were erased after hearings held without them. One had moved abroad without updating his registered address, so letters and emails went unanswered. The other engaged with the GMC but refused to take part, pursuing procedural complaints instead of preparing his defence.

The outcome. The High Court quashed both decisions, but the Court of Appeal allowed the GMC's appeals and restored the erasures. It said panels must exercise their discretion to proceed with great care, and that fairness to the doctor is of prime importance. But a doctor's responsibility to keep their contact details current matters, and the GMC's duty is to communicate with the practitioner at the address they have provided. Failing to keep it up to date is unlikely to be a reasonable explanation for not taking part.

The lesson: keep your registered contact details current throughout a case, read everything the regulator sends, and if you genuinely cannot attend, apply properly for an adjournment, with reasons and evidence, rather than staying away.

Support during a hearing

Representation

A lawyer, or a union or professional body representative. Lay representatives may be allowed with the panel's approval. The NMC's own data shows most professionals struck off at final hearing between 2019 and 2024 were not represented.

Peer support

The BMA's Doctor Support Service offers free peer support, and a supporter can accompany a doctor at a hearing for up to two days.

Process help

The MPTS runs a support service for questions about the process, and the NMC has liaison officers who help with arrangements for giving evidence. They cannot give legal advice.

A McKenzie friend

Someone who can sit with you, take notes and help with papers, but who does not represent you.

Related courseRebuilding Trust: patients, the public and your regulator→
Core course

Fitness to Practise for Healthcare Professionals

4 CPD hours and 40 scenario questions on impairment, insight, remediation and reflection, with a certificate you can include in your hearing bundle.

Completing a course does not change or predict any regulator's decision. Courses are educational and support your own reflection and development.

Frequently asked questions

Who decides a fitness to practise hearing?

A panel of three, usually a chair, a member of your profession and a lay member. A legally qualified chair or an independent legal assessor advises on the law, but the panel decides.

What is the standard of proof?

The civil standard, the balance of probabilities. The regulator must prove each allegation is more likely than not to have happened.

Do I have to attend my hearing?

No, but it is usually in your interests. The hearing can go ahead without you, as the Court of Appeal confirmed in GMC v Adeogba and Visvardis.

Can I ask for a hearing instead of a meeting?

At the NMC, yes. Its guidance says it will always hold a hearing to conclude a case if the professional wants one.

Are hearings public?

Usually. Matters relating to health are heard in private, and other parts can be heard in private where that is reasonable and proportionate.

Will I have to give evidence?

You do not have to, but you have the right to. Your written statement usually stands as your main evidence and you can then be questioned. Not giving evidence can make it harder for the panel to assess your insight.

How long does a hearing last?

It depends on the case. Simple cases may take a day or two; complex disputed cases with many witnesses can take several weeks. MPTS hearing days usually run from 9.30am to 5pm with breaks. Hearings can also overrun: in 2024 to 2025, 17% of HCPTS final hearings went part heard and needed further days.

When will I find out the decision?

Panels usually announce their decision at each stage during the hearing, and provide a written copy of their reasons.

Can I bring someone with me?

Yes. You can be represented, and you can bring a supporter. The BMA's Doctor Support Service can provide a peer supporter to accompany doctors for up to two days.

What if I cannot attend on the date set?

Apply for an adjournment as early as possible, explaining why and providing evidence. Simply not attending risks the case going ahead without you.

Primary sources

14 official documents and judgments
  1. MPTS: Resource for doctors, new MPT hearings
  2. MPTS: Medical practitioners tribunal hearings guidance
  3. NMC: Considering cases at meetings and hearings (CMT-4)
  4. NMC: Attending a hearing
  5. NMC: Fitness to Practise Committee
  6. HCPC: Substantive hearings fact sheet
  7. HCPTS: Stages of a final hearing
  8. GDC: Fitness to Practise Statistical Report 2024
  9. GPhC: Annual report and annual fitness to practise report 2024/25
  10. MPTS: Report to Parliament 2023
  11. NMC: Annual Fitness to Practise Report 2024 to 2025
  12. HCPC Council: Health and Care Professions Tribunal Service report (May 2025)
  13. NMC: Insight into fitness to practise (December 2024)
  14. General Medical Council v Adeogba and Visvardis [2016] EWCA Civ 162, National Archives